Wait, wait, wait – I thought biological sex was a “social construct”?

We have been increasingly beaten to death with the fantasy that sex is a social construct vice a function of biological assignment at conception. That it can be manipulated, erased and/or changed completely to suit one’s mood at any time, and the “something” that is wrong is with us if we do not fall in line and accept that.

That men can birth and nurse children, that women have prostates and penises, and if you merely carves a section of yourself off, do some fancy stitchery on body-parts elsewhere, and ingest a chemical or two for the rest of your life while wearing a costume aping your chosen gender, you have effectively become that sex.

God help those who would beg to differ or gainsay those assertions. They are subject to unending threats, intimidation, actual violence, mob rule, and cancelation.

I’m speaking at University of New Mexico tonight and they stationed 45 police officers with me & hit me with a 10k security charge….

All for saying men are men and women are women😭😂 such a radical position to take. Onward!

— Riley Gaines (@Riley_Gaines_) October 5, 2023

Suffering the targeted erasure of their lives for speaking what is no longer permitted to be said aloud.

Even when trying to protect children from the consequences of permanent decisions their little brains are in no position to make, advocates for caution are driven into hiding or abject groveling to save their very professional lives for even the most insane of infractions.

…Such is the case at the moment with one of Scotland’s theatrical lights. David Greig, one of the most “high-profile” playwrights in the country and artistic director at Edinburgh’s Lyceum Theatre, has taken a knee. He stands accused of being a “transphobe” thanks to – nothing he said, mind you, but tweets he “liked.” And he has crumbled like a stale sandy scone.

And they are forever tainted, still, in the eyes of the alphabet soup sex cult.

Pronouns – of which there are now hundreds – are a protected class, because biological sex IS a social construct.

Heretics who hold to the old ways are burned at the social and economic stake like so much cordwood in a frigid German NetZero compliant household.

My steadfast argument has always been that CIS is their made-up term. I was born a woman, “woman” came first, and they are welcome to call themselves anything with any prefix attached to that. But they are NOT women. and I am not obliged to play the game. All the whacked off (or not) bits in the world, make-up, boob jobs, frilly clothes, or ombre hair do not make them a woman. Biology alone determines a woman and from the womb, which ONLY “women” can have.

Long after a trans is gone, should an archeologist exhume their bones, they’ll identify a male of approximate age, with the remains of two what-look-to-be silicone discs adhered to the ribcage.

For all the screeching, tears, and cries of “Nazis,” they’re still the man or woman they were born before someone sold them a lie or the medical community indulged their social contagion.

More people are willing to speak up as the madness escalated and penalties for not indulging it have been legally imposed. More people are coming to the defense of those who were first to defend biological sex as inviolate.

More irrefutable science is surfacing, too.

Coming hard on the heels of Rishi Sunak’s gobsmacking (for a politician) proclamation last evening…

…And we shouldn’t get bullied…we shouldn’t get bullied into believing that people can be any sex they want to be.

They can’t.

A man is a man and a woman is a woman, and that’s just common sense.

…this is almost too much to bear. It’s as if science – vice The Science™ – heard voices crying out in the wilderness for relief from the madness, roused itself from its study induced stupor, leaned out of the window, and said…

“Of course they can’t just be what they want to be. They are what they ARE.”

…replaced the spectacles on noses and ducked back inside to work.

I thought this was great.

New study reveals how biological sex influences brain proteins and disease risk

An Emory led study published in Nature Medicine and Synapse sheds light on how biological sex influences brain function and its impact on the risk of various brain-related diseases. For decades, it has been observed that many psychiatric and neurological conditions exhibit different prevalence rates between males and females. However, the underlying mechanisms that drive these differences have remained largely unknown.

Do tell. Men and women are different – as in “not interchangeable”?

Seems not. Not their bone structure, musculature – why not even right down to the teeny, tiny proteins in their grey matter.

…Using data from more than a thousand brain samples in two community-based longitudinal studies, they compared proteins between males and females and found that around 13% of the proteins were different between the sexes in at least one region of the brain. Some proteins were more abundant in females, while others were more abundant in males.

The team also investigated how genetic variation can influence proteins and found that 5.5% of genes had sex-related differences in both their transcripts (gene messages) and proteins. Importantly, they discovered that the effects of sex on genetic regulation were more prominent at the protein level than at the transcript level.

To understand the significance of these findings, they connected proteins with sex differences to brain-related conditions and found that about 25% of the proteins known to be linked to these brain conditionss had sex-related differences in abundance. Furthermore, they found that certain proteins predipose to brain disorders in one sex but not the other.

SEX RELATED DIFFERENCES

A man is a man and a woman is a woman.

The next time the argument comes up, tell them anyone with half a brain should know that’s true.

Any random brain knows the difference.